A venture capitalist in New York is
speaking out against patents, urging their abolishment:
My point is this. Innovation is an evolution. Everybody takes from everybody else. A truly competitve darwinian system where it's survival of the fittest may produce orders of magnitude more innovation than a system where someone gets to keep a lid on their invention (if in fact it is their invention which is a serious problem with our current system).
I think of the patent system in our country a bit like the tenure system in our academic institutions. It protects ideas and people that may not deserve to be protected and it allows for underperformance and it stifles creativity and energy.
Clearly we cannot abolish our system of intellectual property overnight. Many billions of dollars (including tens of millions of capital I manage) has been invested in companies that are using intellectual property protection as a competitive weapon. If there is going to be change, it must be gradual.
But I am encouraging all of us, the readers of this blog, other bloggers, academics, politicians, public policy wonks, and anyone else who cares about innovation in our country and the world at large to think hard about a world without patents and less intellectual property protection broadly speaking and what impact that would have on innovation and the flow of capital around innovation.
I believe we need a new way in the years to come. Our current approach is holding us back, not taking us forward.
Keep in mind, VC's are the guys funding innovative startups. They aren't puppets of large corporations, and they aren't crackpots.
2 Comments:
Although I do find the idea behind your blog very interesting, there is one thing to say against complete liberation: if I can copy anything, I don't have to invest in r&d, thus being able to charge much less than the company or creator which originally spent time & money to develop something. I used to work for a pharma company, so I know intimally the abuses that often happen - but that's another discussion. I did not have time to read your whole blog, so forgive me if you've adressed this previously, but what would be the incentive for s/o to invest in something if they don't have a way to get their money back and make a profit?
ogro, Why Drug Companies Don't Need Patents
and On the Necessity of Drug Patents contain some arguments (or point to some resources) that might be of interest to you.
Post a Comment
<< Home